Since the demise of the music industry music industry as we knew it, slimy music distribution companies | have popped up all over the internet. | ![]() | One of the slimiest is a crime ring called TuneCore. Reviews on ToneCore are poor. TuneCore's Better | Business Bureau rating is a B-. Contacting ToneCore is next to impossible. | TuneCore has been or is under an FBI investigation for accounting fraud. | Tunecore Accounting Fraud - An FBI ALERT! - YouTubeExposed TuneCore Scam (Reviews Collection)
https://tunecorereviews2012.wordpress.com/
Jun 17, 2012 - CDBaby has a one time flat fee, while Tunecore charges musicians .... is true that Tunecoreoffers a good service, I read that the FBI is going to ...
Related links:
99.9% of Tunecore Artists Make Less Than Minimum Wage… (Shocked)
From a ripped off TuneCore user:
Contacting TuneCore is not easy. They don't list any contact information but I was able to locate a street address 45 Main Street, Suite 705 Brooklyn NY 11201, and a phone number (646) 651-1060.
Warning Is Tunecore A Scam : The Music Business : Looperman Forums
CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINST TUNECORP
TUNECORE specifically Liz Morgan and their legal department CLASS ACTION IN THE WORKS---ALL ARTISTS SCAMMED BY TUNECORE: CONTACT ME!!! Brooklyn, NY Internet
TUNECORE specifically Liz Morgan and their legal department CLASS ACTION IN THE WORKS---ALL ARTISTS SCAMMED BY TUNECORE: CONTACT ME!!! Brooklyn, NY InternetTuneCore TuneCore lies and threatens New York New Yorkhttp://www.ripoffreport.com/r/TuneCore/New-York-New-York/TuneCore-TuneCore-lies-and-threatens-New-York-New-York-1245183TUNECORE.COM TUNECORE & Brian with email support SCAM FRAUD THIEVES CROOKS Brooklyn New Yorkhttp://www.ripoffreport.com/r/TUNECORECOM/Brooklyn-New-York-11201/TUNECORECOM-TUNECORE-Brian-with-email-support-SCAM-FRAUD-THIEVES-CROOKS-Brooklyn-New-1092022 |
This blog is here to warn people about the dishonesty of DAW software vendors and the downfalls of using many of today's buggy DAWs. CLICK THE BUG!
Showing posts with label TuneCore sucks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TuneCore sucks. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 7, 2016
TuneCore Criminal Scam
Monday, July 15, 2013
Mixcraft vs Reaper vs Audacity
UPDATE: Mixcraft 6.1 as far as DAWS go is a very good DAW. 6 had issues typical of most of today's DAWS. Acoustica now makes a respectable DAW that is very easy to learn and it has a great workflow. While I don't recommend any DAW software I can safely say that if you like DAWs, Mixcraft 6.1 will not disappoint and Reaper still sucks.
CLICK HERE TO LEARN WHY TO AVOID TUNECORE
This is from Acoustic Guitar Forum
A newbie asks:
I'm looking at learning a DAW for solo acoustc guitar only. MIxcraft looks like it might be the most user-freindly; Reaper seems to get the best overall reviews, and Audacity is free. I'm leaning toward Mixcraft if that would greatly minimize the learning curve!
Any suggestions or comments?
Here are the responses:
Reaper ... by a long shot! You can evaluate a 100% functional, non-expiring copy of Reaper for free, and only register when you decide it's what you need (just $40 ... a real steal). I use it extensively. I've added EZDrummer for percussion, and it works seamlessly with Reaper.
Audacity doesn't come close.
For just solo guitar any of them will work, Audacity is not bad for one or 2 instruments but does not support VST effects very well.
Mixcraft has a timing problem, it drifts something bad as the song progresses....and yes, I am talking about the newest version also.
Reaper s much better, but a larger learning curve.....
There is another DAW that slips under the radar a lot by Zynewave called Podium that has a very workable Free version. I felt the included effects were fine, and it was pretty easy to figure out....plus the price is right!
Are you using Audacity 1.3.x beta when you have issues with the VST support? I'm getting the full UI with VSTs I've installed in the latest beta version, which is the one recommended by the devs.
I'd heard a glancing mention of the Mixcraft timing issue but foolishly _assumed_ that it only applied to MIDI. Sounds pretty annoying.
I came from Adobe Audition/Cool Edit Pro and my recording was limited to using the two track editor for a number of years. Man, was I doing things the hard way <grin>. The first time I tried REAPER I couldn't grasp the concept at all.
Just as I started transitioning to the multi-track non-destructive way of editing in AA I ran into a snag with Adobe's license validation process and it made me so mad I became determined to learn to use REAPER. Fortunately I found a number of free video tutorials which got me over the first humps and I made the switch without significant self-inflicted injury.
A long winded way of saying that the user created resources for REAPER are pretty wonderful and can help ease the learning a lot.
Fran
Reaper sucks. The native plugins are horrible and unusable and when you install a plugin Reaper crashes. Reaper is ugly, unstable and difficult to learn. Mixcraft wins by a mile. -Mark-
Mixcraft mentions timing of some computers here
http://www.acoustica.com/mixcraft/v4/help/hs1550.htm
Audacity is what I used originally, and it's ok for getting ideas down. However, REAPER is awesome, and relatively user friendly. It takes a little learning, but so does Audacity; and once you start learning REAPER you're already starting to put that time and knowledge into a program that professionals use. Eli
I've used both and now I am using Mixcraft. Reaper crashes and freezes to the point it is worthless. Reaper is also bare bones and to get it to where it has enough plugins you have to pay through the ass because the free plugins and loops suck and many of the are not compatible with Reaper aka Raper.
Reaper is just some shitty software that remains in perpetual buggy beta mode.
Here is a side by side comparison of Reaper vs Mixcraft
CLICK HERE TO LEARN WHY TO AVOID TUNECORE
This is from Acoustic Guitar Forum
A newbie asks:
I'm looking at learning a DAW for solo acoustc guitar only. MIxcraft looks like it might be the most user-freindly; Reaper seems to get the best overall reviews, and Audacity is free. I'm leaning toward Mixcraft if that would greatly minimize the learning curve!
Any suggestions or comments?
Here are the responses:
Reaper ... by a long shot! You can evaluate a 100% functional, non-expiring copy of Reaper for free, and only register when you decide it's what you need (just $40 ... a real steal). I use it extensively. I've added EZDrummer for percussion, and it works seamlessly with Reaper.
Audacity doesn't come close.
For just solo guitar any of them will work, Audacity is not bad for one or 2 instruments but does not support VST effects very well.
Mixcraft has a timing problem, it drifts something bad as the song progresses....and yes, I am talking about the newest version also.
Reaper s much better, but a larger learning curve.....
There is another DAW that slips under the radar a lot by Zynewave called Podium that has a very workable Free version. I felt the included effects were fine, and it was pretty easy to figure out....plus the price is right!
Are you using Audacity 1.3.x beta when you have issues with the VST support? I'm getting the full UI with VSTs I've installed in the latest beta version, which is the one recommended by the devs.
I'd heard a glancing mention of the Mixcraft timing issue but foolishly _assumed_ that it only applied to MIDI. Sounds pretty annoying.
I came from Adobe Audition/Cool Edit Pro and my recording was limited to using the two track editor for a number of years. Man, was I doing things the hard way <grin>. The first time I tried REAPER I couldn't grasp the concept at all.
Just as I started transitioning to the multi-track non-destructive way of editing in AA I ran into a snag with Adobe's license validation process and it made me so mad I became determined to learn to use REAPER. Fortunately I found a number of free video tutorials which got me over the first humps and I made the switch without significant self-inflicted injury.
A long winded way of saying that the user created resources for REAPER are pretty wonderful and can help ease the learning a lot.
Fran
Reaper sucks. The native plugins are horrible and unusable and when you install a plugin Reaper crashes. Reaper is ugly, unstable and difficult to learn. Mixcraft wins by a mile. -Mark-
Mixcraft mentions timing of some computers here
http://www.acoustica.com/mixcraft/v4/help/hs1550.htm
Audacity is what I used originally, and it's ok for getting ideas down. However, REAPER is awesome, and relatively user friendly. It takes a little learning, but so does Audacity; and once you start learning REAPER you're already starting to put that time and knowledge into a program that professionals use. Eli
I've used both and now I am using Mixcraft. Reaper crashes and freezes to the point it is worthless. Reaper is also bare bones and to get it to where it has enough plugins you have to pay through the ass because the free plugins and loops suck and many of the are not compatible with Reaper aka Raper.
Reaper is just some shitty software that remains in perpetual buggy beta mode.
Reaper crashes constantly... - Cockos Confederated Forums
Sep 7, 2008 - 12 posts - 5 authors
I was editing a drum track I made in EZ Drummer and putting in a new mix of these tracks when Reaper started to crash all the time, even if I ...Here is a side by side comparison of Reaper vs Mixcraft
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)